Nvidia’s new GTX 1650 relies on a contemporary TU117 GPU which guarantees to have all the advantages of the Turing structure. That means you get the power to run integer and floating level operations concurrently, a unified cache structure, and the power to utilise adaptive shading, all to enhance gaming efficiency. Good, eh?
And together with the opposite new Turing GPUs additionally got here a brand new model of the NVENC video encoder, a little bit of devoted logic that provides 15% larger encoding effectivity and incorporates options to keep away from artifacting when recording or streaming.
But, whereas the GTX 1650 does get all the opposite Turing shader goodness, it seems the video encoder is definitely based mostly on the last-gen Volta model of NVENC and doesn’t have the Turing advantages. So it’s lacking a number of the Turing goodness, prices greater than AMD’s RX 570 and may’t carry out on the identical degree as that high finances card. I don’t need to preserve kicking a new graphics card when it’s down, but it surely’s getting more durable to see what the purpose is within the existence of the GTX 1650.
An eagle-eyed Twitter consumer noticed the distinction on Nvidia’s personal product web page and questioned the graphics firm concerning the completely different variations of NVENC getting used on the completely different TU116 and TU117 GPUs.
Image is all the pieces: The best gaming monitors round at the moment
The response from Nvidia is that the Volta model of NVENC is definitely extra just like the Pascal model that accompanied the GTX 10-series GPUs than the silicon utilized by the remainder of the Turing technology of graphics playing cards. That means you get a weaker encoding half used on the lowest-end 16-series GPU than all of the others.
Volta’s NVENC performs like Pascal’s NVENC. So high quality is much like that of GTX 10 Series. Turing’s NVENC is 15% extra environment friendly and has the brand new options to keep away from artifacting.
— NVIDIA Streaming (@NVIDIAStreaming) April 24, 2019
I get that the GTX 1650 is the most affordable of Nvidia’s present technology of pixel pushers, however slicing out the encoder looks like a change that may’t have actually saved that a lot money throughout manufacturing. Nvidia does make the purpose that the Volta encoder continues to be fairly first rate, stil offloading the burden from the CPU and permitting you to play and stream each at 4K… regardless of the GTX 1650 demonstrably not really being able to gaming at 4K.
It does, nonetheless, imply that should you had been on the lookout for an inexpensive streaming GPU in your PC then Nvidia’s $150 GTX 1650 isn’t going to be as efficient because it may need been with the usual Turing NVENC. And it additionally signifies that these GTX 1650 laptops aren’t going to be the kind of factor low-budget media creators will probably be that completely happy to pay out on.
It’s not an enormous problem – the Turing NVENC silicon isn’t precisely a deal-breaker for a graphics card that’s each costlier and slower than the competitors’s two year-old finances hero. So no-one was realistically going to be shopping for a GTX 1650 for the Turing model of Nvidia’s encoding logic in any case, but it surely provides but extra weight to the sensation that it is a moderately half-hearted GPU launch.
Source
