CCP are responding to the rising use of bots in EVE Online by making a softer ban for first offenders whereas retaining the everlasting ban for second offenders. They’re additionally defined why gamers are beginning to see a rise in botters because the recreation went free-to-play.
“Unrestricted Alpha access and Skill Trading have led to an increase in account hijacking issues and lowered the barrier of entry for botting,” CCP write in a new blog post.
The builders aren’t sitting idle, final month the staff banned over 1,800 accounts discovered to be runnings bots or for being automated. “Mining bots were the largest group represented, with ratting bots coming in a close second,” the weblog states. A 3rd of these had been banned completely.
While CCP is ready to detect some bot exercise on their very own, additionally they reiterate that neighborhood reporting does work and it’s each nameless and with out danger of getting anybody banned by chance. CCP can inform by taking a look at an account’s exercise to know if it’s been botting or not.
In response to the rising downside with botting, CCP have made a stunning change to their botting coverage. Your first offence will get you a 3 day ban. Previously, it was a 30 day ban. The purpose for the change is give gamers caught botting “a painless chance to mend their wicked ways.”
The everlasting ban for a second offense stays. So anybody who didn’t study the lesson from the slap on the wrist “will simply get removed from the game pronto and we can all move on,” the weblog submit states.
This small change in coverage has deserved a big announcement from CCP as a result of the staff have realised that the notion of the botting downside is worse than the have an effect on it’s having on the sport.
In a name earlier than the submit went stay, CCP Peligro informed me that “We’ve been measuring bans for the longest time and we’re not so sure that has any impact, so now we’re trying to measure player sentiment as the true indicator of whether or not we’re doing a good job.”
Source