Do I really want to jot down one other introductory paragraph on the Battlefront II loot box controversy? If you’re studying this, you’ve in all probability already seen one among a billion completely different items on the storm round this sport, which hasn’t died down even after EA eliminated microtransaction purchases from the title.
If you want a refresher, this is everything wrong with the Battlefront II progression system.
Gamers haven’t calmed down partly as a result of EA have each intention of returning microtransactions into the sport – we simply don’t but know what kind they’ll take. That’s one thing EA CFO Blake Jorgensen reaffirmed at in the present day’s Credit Suisse 21st Annual Technology, Media & Telecom Conference, in keeping with GamesIndustry.biz.
“We’re not giving up on the notion of MTX,” says Jorgensen. “We’re learning and listening to the community in terms of how best to roll that out in the future, and there’s more to come as we learn more. But I would say we’re certainly not changing our strategy.”
An enormous a part of why Battlefront II has taken an excellent better beating than different microtransaction-driven video games is as a result of its objects have an effect on gameplay. Titles like Overwatch have seen way more success with beauty objects that have an effect on the look of your characters. But Jorgensen says that wouldn’t work for Star Wars.
“If you probably did a bunch of beauty issues, you would possibly begin to violate the canon. Darth Vader in white in all probability would not make sense, versus in black. Not to say you in all probability don’t desire Darth Vader in pink. No offense to pink, however I do not suppose that is proper within the canon.”
Regardless of how you’re feeling about pink Darth Vader, it’s simple to think about this as extra of a Lucasfilm directive than one which comes from EA or DICE, particularly contemplating a cosmetic-driven mode is reported to have been cut from the game on the behest of the Star Wars brandmasters. A dataminer going by Uninspired Zebra has even dug up a hidden character customisation menu within the sport.
CNBC report that EA’s inventory worth has been affected by the controversy, with an eight.5% month-to-date drop in comparison with the S&P 500’s 2% achieve. In the identical interval, Take-Two and Activision Blizzard – each firms with huge microtransaction revenues – grew 5% and zero.7% respectively. The drop in EA’s share values interprets to a $three billion loss, however that quantity appears extra important than it truly is in keeping with analyst Daniel Ahmad.
For context. The final time it was this low was…….. July 2017……. so….. nothing to see right here. pic.twitter.com/kroiYIqoeD
— Daniel Ahmad (@ZhugeEX) November 28, 2017
That’s to not say the loss in worth has no impact, however whether or not EA’s route sooner or later will change relies on way over a single dangerous day on Wall Street.
Source
