Battlefront 2’s controversial loot containers comprise objects that make you extra prone to win the sport – however they didn’t wish to go down the opposite path and supply beauty objects in them.
We’ve lined the controversy right here at size already – Star Wars Battlefront 2 contained loot crates that made it easier to win if you happen to spent cash on them, and followers were not happy. The system has been compared to gambling by a number of politicians and our bodies.
With strain mounting, and after strain from Disney, EA removed the microtransactions from the sport. They’ll be again, in some kind or one other, however a whole lot of injury has already been achieved to the sport’s model.
One query that has been raised usually is why the sport couldn’t merely herald cash with beauty loot-box rewards – a system that, whereas nonetheless not nice, is a bit much less insidious than the one Battlefront 2 has.
Speaking on the Credit Suisse Annual Technology, Media & Telecom Conference (as transcribed by Polygon), EA chief monetary officer Blake Jorgensen addressed this query, explaining that it was a problem of Star Wars canon.
According to Jorgensen, placing in beauty choices that weren’t in keeping with what gamers would sometimes anticipate will disrupt the canonical look of the sequence. “It’s an amazing brand that’s been built over many, many years, and so if you did a bunch of cosmetic things, you might start to violate the canon”, he mentioned.
While he admits that there’s some room for customisation – like altering the color of your lightsabre – that is the excuse they’re deciding on for why their lootboxes comprise objects that can assist gamers succeed slightly than beauty objects. Hmmm. The proven fact that characters from totally different timelines all seem collectively directly, and the truth that Star Wars ‘canon’ is a messy idea, doesn’t come up.
It’ll be attention-grabbing to see if Battlefront 2 will get a significant shake-up in its monetisation mannequin as soon as microtransactions return – we’ll keep watch over the state of affairs.
Source
