It seems to be like Nvidia’s next-generation graphics card, whether or not GTX 1180 or GTX 2080, will not less than be introduced by August 20, when the Hot Chips Symposium rolls round. The program has now been launched for the occasion with all the large names in attendance, and the speak that’s caught our consideration is the one by Stuart Oberman titled: ‘NVIDIA’s Next Generation Mainstream GPU’ within the Graphics Solution slot on the Monday.
The title has clearly been saved intentionally imprecise so we don’t get any early hints as to what the brand new gaming-focused Nvidia graphics playing cards are referred to as, or what structure they’re going to be powered by.
Check out all of the rumours, information, and guesswork about Nvidia’s GTX 1180.
Given that Oberman’s Hot Chips speak will possible go into some element concerning the new GeForce GPU it appears fairly possible that it’ll both be introduced earlier than then, or we would probably even see them launched by August 20. We’ve heard that Gamescom shall be an enormous deal for Nvidia, and that falls only a day later…
Hot Chips issued a press launch yesterday which particulars the nice and the great of PC gaming know-how representing on the occasion.
“We will hear from the CPU and GPU giants: AMD that includes their next-gen consumer chip, NVIDIA with their next-gen GPU, and Intel with an attention-grabbing die-stacked CPU with iGPU plus stacked dGPU.”
That may imply we’ll additionally hear extra about Threadripper 2 – which is about for an August launch – and we would even get some extra particulars about what Intel is as much as with its discrete GPU. If Intel is stacking its discrete graphics silicon that might make for some severe efficiency, even when it simply used its present structure.
But that is the primary concrete proof from Nvidia that it’s undoubtedly going to be delivery a brand new gaming GPU this summer season, and that’s nice information for everybody. Except AMD. And these of us with restricted money reserves…
Oh lord, it may be horrifically costly, is not it?
Source