Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines 2 is “an apparent alternative” for Paradox

Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines 2 is “an apparent alternative” for Paradox

The way forward for the Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines 2 franchise will depend on the implementation of a “seven-to-ten year cycle,” in response to Paradox Interactive’s CEO. In an interview with SE7EN.WS at PDXCon this weekend, Fred Wester stated the corporate had been contemplating ongoing potentialities for the franchise.

Wester says “we are experimenting with a couple of the White Wolf brands right now,” however are conscious {that a} new franchise can’t be instantly began from scratch (“for those who’re going to construct a giant franchise it’s essential suppose in a seven-to-ten yr cycle”) and that if the Vampire IP was to obtain that sort of consideration, “we need to know what the next ten years are going to look like.”

As good as we speak as they had been at launch – here is a listing of the best classic PC games.

A brand new Vampire recreation does appear to be one thing comparatively excessive on Paradox’s checklist – Wester acknowledges {that a} second Vampire recreation “is an obvious choice” – but it surely’s not one thing they’ll start but – “it needs to feel right, it needs to be the right team […] for the game.”

Wester additionally suggests it’s unlikely {that a} new Vampire recreation could be Bloodlines 2, however that it could possibly be “something Vampire RPG.” However, he additionally states that “the first game [in the new franchise] is probably going to be the worst game from us that they ever see in this franchise, because the [second] one will improve on the first one.” If any of that sounds acquainted, it’s as a result of this isn’t the primary time Paradox have mentioned the opportunity of a brand new Vampire recreation – ultimately yr’s PDXCon, they stated they stated they’ll make a Bloodlines sequel “when the time is right.” That’s undoubtedly excellent news, even when there’s nothing to say when that point might probably be simply but.


 
Source

Read also