AMD and Nvidia are genuinely aggressive once more, and the Radeon RX 5700 and the AMD RX 5700 XT are proof optimistic of that reality. The crimson crew reacted strongly to Nvidia’s RTX Super card spoilers, which is nice information for us PC players as a result of it tangibly forcing the price of these new GPUs down. Sure, it’s simply child steps proper now, however graphics card pricing is now even altering earlier than a brand new GPU has launched. Now, I do know nobody actually likes an ‘I told you so,’ but I did…
Both the AMD Navi-based GPUs had main value drops within the face of Nvidia’s Super launch pre-empting the RX 5700-series’ July 7 launch date. And the drop all the way down to $399 for the XT card, which was nearly the unique value for this straight RX 5700 card, now signifies that the highest Navi providing has nearly utterly taken down the RTX 2060 Super, and is giving the RTX 2070 Super some severe meals for thought too.
It’s a head-to-head combat for players’ hearts and minds that’s leading to extra gaming efficiency for much less money and that may solely be a great factor. But the place does that go away the cut-down RX 5700?
Essentially the RX 5700’s focus hasn’t actually shifted. Previously, at $379, it was staring down Nvidia’s RTX 2060 and providing larger gaming efficiency for just a little additional money. That was just a little little bit of a sticking level for the brand new Navi card when its pricing was first revealed at E3, with folks questioning why it had been priced above the Nvidia GPU when many had anticipated AMD to actually go after the GeForce jugular.
But now it’s delivery for a similar value as that lowest rung of the RTX ladder, and pretty considerably undercutting the brand new RTX 2060 Super, arguably the worth of the RX 5700 has gone up.
We had anticipated the RX 5700 XT could be in its sights for some mild Radeon fratricide by way of normal overclocking, however AMD has locked the RX 5700’s frequency and energy limits to cease that occuring. Thankfully there’s a technique to unleash the full potential of the RX 5700 and match the XT.
What are the AMD RX 5700 specs?
The traditional AMD rule-of-two means there’s all the time a grasp and an apprentice for a given GPU. Shout out to my fellow Star Wars nerds. And so the 7nm Navi 10 chip on the coronary heart of the RX 5700 is basically the identical because the one working the XT version. It’s obtained the identical 10.3bn transistors inside its 251mm2 die, and the identical spectacular, gaming-focused RDNA structure behind it.
Check out our Navi RDNA deep-dive if you would like a extra detailed break-down of the architectural adjustments behind the brand new silicon, however suffice to say AMD has made a break from the outdated compute-focused GCN chip design and created one that’s extra geared towards throughput and gaming workloads. A wise selection given the place else the Navi GPUs are set for use subsequent yr…
| Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Ed. | Radeon RX 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700 | |
| GPU | AMD Navi 10 | AMD Navi 10 | AMD Navi 10 |
| Lithography | 7nm FinFET | 7nm FinFET | 7nm FinFET |
| Compute items | 40 | 40 | 36 |
| RDNA Cores | 2,560 | 2,560 | 2,304 |
| Memory | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bandwidth | 448GB/s | 448GB/s | 448GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,980MHz | 1,905MHz | 1,725MHz |
| Game clock | 1,830MHz | 1,755MHz | 1,625MHz |
| Base clock | 1,680MHz | 1,605MHz | 1,465MHz |
| Transistors | 10.3bn | 10.3bn | 10.3bn |
| Die dimension | 251mm2 | 251mm2 | 251mm2 |
| TDP | 225W | 225W | 180W |
| Price | $449 | £429 | $399 | £380 | $349 | £340 |
AMD has clearly in the reduction of the GPU going into the RX 5700 in contrast with the XT. There are 4 fewer compute items within the cheaper card’s structure, which really solely equates to a pair of the newly designated ‘work group processors.’ In phrases of the stream processors inside these CUs which means you’re getting 256 fewer ‘cores,’ for need of a greater time period.
But that’s about it in sheer silicon phrases. You get the identical 64 render output items (ROPs) within the chip structure, the identical 8GB of GDDR6 reminiscence, working on the similar 14Gbps, and the identical 256-bit aggregated reminiscence bus taking care of it.
Where AMD has actually hobbled the RX 5700 is within the clock velocity. Remember, the RDNA structure is about throughput, about delivering excessive efficiency with out a particular give attention to parallelism. That’s why the 64 compute items of the RX Vega 64 will be comfortably bested in gaming phrases by simply the 36 CUs used contained in the RX 5700. And so merely reducing CUs from the total GPU spec doesn’t make a large distinction to the general gaming efficiency of the chip.
Cutting the frequency, nevertheless, completely does. And the RX 5700 is working its GPU considerably slower than the RX 5700 XT.
In phrases of the rated speeds AMD is utilizing a brand new time period – Game clock. This is arguably a little bit of a cake-and-eat-it scenario for the crimson crew, the place it nonetheless will get to shout about its hardly ever seen peak engine clock velocity whereas additionally referencing the real-world efficiency you’re really prone to see.
The RX 5700 has a Game clock of 1,625MHz and the XT has a Game clock of 1,755MHz. That 130MHz distinction doesn’t appear too nice, however in our testing we had been seeing the XT really high even its peak engine clock of 1,905MHz, typically hitting 1,943MHz, whereas the RX 5700 barely obtained above its rated Game clock velocity at a peak of 1,677MHz. That potential 266MHz distinction is kind of a large hole and goes a protracted technique to explaining the body fee delta between the 2 Navi siblings.
AMD Radeon RX 5700 benchmarks
How does the AMD RX 5700 carry out?
If we take the RX 5700’s important goal first – the OG RTX 2060, a card that’s nonetheless being stored round regardless of Nvidia’s Super launch – it’s in bother. If you simply take a look at the 3DMark and Assassin’s Creed Odyssey efficiency you’d be forgiven for considering that these two identically priced playing cards the place on par, however look additional and the delta turns into between 10 – 15% in favour of the brand new AMD GPU. And that’s true whether or not you’re wanting on the 1080p or 1400p ranges.
the RTX 2060 Super is barely 5% faster on the widest margin between the 2 playing cards
The relative efficiency to the more-expensive RTX 2060 Super can also be fascinating. At 1440p the Nvidia card does typically have some room to breathe, once more within the 3DMark and Assassin’s Creed benchmarks, however elsewhere it’s far nearer – to the purpose the place the body fee delta virtually disappears.
It’s much more stark at 1080p the place the RTX 2060 Super is barely 5% faster on the widest margin between the 2 playing cards. Throw in just a little primary overclocking and you may get RTX 2060 Super efficiency out of the RX 5700… although the identical is also stated for the Nvidia card in relation to pulling away from the second-tier Navi once more and catching as much as the Radeon RX 5700 XT.
But due to the substitute blocks put in place by AMD the gaming hole between the usual 5700 and the XT card can’t be bridged by some vanilla WattMan tweaking alone. It’s taken some third-party software program to unshackle the RX 5700 to permit it to actually stretch its legs, and present that the 4 compute unit distinction is subsequent to nothing in gaming efficiency. But it’s a easy matter of a few mild downloads and a few non-invasive tweaking and your RX 5700 will simply provide XT body charges.
And with some even handed undervolting blended in, it would ship that efficiency with a decrease GPU temperature too…
The historic efficiency targets additionally spotlight the advances AMD has made with the Navi RDNA structure. This $349 card comfortably tops the outdated $499 RX Vega 64 when it comes to gaming body charges, and when it comes to energy and thermals too. At peak, the RX 5700 runs with 26% decrease energy calls for and does so 10°C cooler.
That’s evidently not only a results of the change to the 7nm lithography both, as a result of in case you take a look at the RX 5700 XT, to get to its GPU efficiency the Navi chip on the XT’s coronary heart runs on the similar thermal ranges because the Vega silicon and with nearly the identical energy draw too.
Those thermal and energy ranges additionally spotlight how a lot better Nvidia’s 12nm Turing effectivity nonetheless is. The RTX 2060 Super could solely be just a little quicker than the RX 5700, however it runs 11°C cooler and solely sucks down one other 14W when it comes to peak GPU energy. All that regardless of being a 12nm design on a chip that’s a full 70% bigger than the 7nm Navi silicon.
Nvidia has now confirmed it’s going to be shifting to Samsung’s 7nm EUV node – in all probability subsequent yr – for its subsequent era structure and which means the inexperienced crew’s GPUs are solely going to get extra environment friendly. And, relying on how deep the EUV integration goes and the way a lot of a reduction Nvidia will get for being a 7nm launch companion for Samsung, its manufacturing prices might be fairly low too.
AMD Radeon RX 5700 verdict
At launch this was a tricky one to name. The pre-launch value minimize for the RX 5700 didn’t have wherever close to as dramatic an affect because the one which the RX 5700 XT has loved, and with such a slight value hole, and unassailable efficiency hole, the XT looks as if a no brainer.
But with its GPU frequency unshackled, and a few mild overclocking and undervolting blended in, the RX 5700 can completely boss the sub-$400 value level. It bests the RTX 2060 Super and matches the RX 5700 XT whereas solely costing as a lot because the RTX 2060. In reality, with additional latest value cuts the usual RX 5700 is nearer to $300.
There is the ray traced elephant within the room. Nvidia has whole dominion over the next-gen pretties, whereas AMD has admitted that’s not coming to its PC GPUs till the following roll of the Navi cube. You could scoff on the function now, however Nvidia and Microsoft are dedicated to ray tracing on the PC, and Microsoft and Sony are dedicated to it for his or her respective next-gen consoles. And simply take a look at the E3 game bulletins; no matter your emotions about ray traced results it’s taking place, and increasingly more games and builders will begin to sport this additional degree of visible constancy.
Nvidia will say its playing cards want to the long run, whereas AMD’s are caught prior to now
But AMD’s playing cards can’t take part on this visible feast. It will level to the GPU calls for of turning on the function, and level to its playing cards being targeted on pure gaming efficiency with out body fee dropping extras. But you might say the identical for any variety of graphical applied sciences of their nascent phases, hell, even larger resolutions too. Why transfer from 720p to 1080p if it cuts my efficiency? Why use anti-aliasing? Nvidia will say its playing cards want to the long run, whereas AMD’s are caught prior to now.
Where you see your self in that specific argument will dictate whether or not you simply need a graphics card that may deal with the rasterised gaming calls for of at present or whether or not you wish to take part on the ray tracing occasion.
But whichever of these you select the RX 5700 is a far simpler card to suggest now than it was at launch. It’s value has dropped, it’s efficiency potential unleashed, and when it’s solely $50 greater than the far-weaker GTX 1660 Ti it’s grow to be a improbable gaming card.
You do have to put within the work to make it that nice a card, however it has the worth proposition to supply and a few severe efficiency in addition. It was being outmuscled in a really crowded market with its AMD shackles in place, however as soon as you discover the important thing it turns into a simple advice.
Source
