It’s occurring. It’s actually occurring. AMD and Nvidia are tremendous aggressive once more, and with the launch of this Radeon RX 5700 and the AMD RX 5700 XT the crimson group has reacted strongly to Nvidia’s RTX Super card spoilers. This is nice information for us PC avid gamers as a result of it’s tangibly forcing GPU pricing down. Sure, it’s child steps proper now, but it surely’s really occurring even earlier than a card is launched. No one likes an ‘I told you so,’ but I told you so.
Both the AMD Navi-based GPUs have had main value drops within the face of Nvidia’s Super launch pre-empting the RX 5700-series July 7 launch date. And the drop right down to $399 for the XT card, which was nearly the unique value for this straight RX 5700 card, now signifies that the highest Navi providing has nearly utterly taken down the RTX 2060 Super, and is giving the RTX 2070 Super some critical meals for thought too.
It’s a head-to-head struggle for avid gamers’ hearts and minds that’s leading to extra gaming efficiency for much less money and that may solely be a very good factor. But the place does that depart the cut-down RX 5700 now it’s simply $50 lower than its stronger sibling?
Essentially the RX 5700’s focus hasn’t actually shifted. Previously, at $379, it was staring down Nvidia’s RTX 2060 and providing greater gaming efficiency for a bit of further money. That was a bit of little bit of a sticking level for the brand new Navi card when its pricing was first revealed at E3, with folks questioning why it had been priced above the Nvidia GPU when many had anticipated AMD to actually go after the GeForce jugular.
But now it’s delivery for a similar value as that lowest rung of the RTX ladder, and pretty considerably undercutting the brand new RTX 2060 Super, arguably the worth of the RX 5700 has gone up. And as soon as we get an overclocking-friendly launch driver post-launch even the RX 5700 XT could possibly be in its sights for some gentle Radeon fratricide.
AMD Radeon RX 5700 specs
The traditional AMD rule-of-two means there’s all the time a grasp and an apprentice for a given GPU. Shout out to my fellow Star Wars nerds on the market. And so the 7nm Navi 10 chip on the coronary heart of the RX 5700 is essentially the identical because the one operating the XT version. It’s acquired the identical 10.3bn transistors inside its 251mm2 die, and the identical spectacular, gaming-focused RDNA structure behind it.
Check out our Navi RDNA deep-dive if you would like a extra detailed break-down of the architectural modifications behind the brand new silicon, however suffice to say AMD has made a break from the previous compute-focused GCN chip design and created one that’s extra geared towards throughput and gaming workloads. A sensible alternative given the place else the Navi GPUs are set for use subsequent yr…
| Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Ed. | Radeon RX 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700 | |
| GPU | AMD Navi 10 | AMD Navi 10 | AMD Navi 10 |
| Lithography | 7nm FinFET | 7nm FinFET | 7nm FinFET |
| Compute items | 40 | 40 | 36 |
| RDNA Cores | 2,560 | 2,560 | 2,304 |
| Memory | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bandwidth | 448GB/s | 448GB/s | 448GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,980MHz | 1,905MHz | 1,725MHz |
| Game clock | 1,830MHz | 1,755MHz | 1,625MHz |
| Base clock | 1,680MHz | 1,605MHz | 1,465MHz |
| Transistors | 10.3bn | 10.3bn | 10.3bn |
| Die measurement | 251mm2 | 251mm2 | 251mm2 |
| TDP | 225W | 225W | 180W |
| Price | $449 | £429 | $399 | £380 | $349 | £340 |
AMD has clearly reduce the GPU going into the RX 5700 in contrast with the XT. There are 4 fewer compute items within the cheaper card’s format, which really solely equates to a pair of the newly designated ‘work group processors.’ In phrases of the stream processors inside these CUs which means you’re getting 256 fewer ‘cores,’ for need of a greater time period.
But that’s about it in sheer silicon phrases. You get the identical 64 render output items (ROPs) within the chip format, the identical 8GB of GDDR6 reminiscence, operating on the similar 14Gbps, and the identical 256-bit aggregated reminiscence bus taking care of it.
Where AMD has actually hobbled the RX 5700 is within the clock pace. Remember, the RDNA structure is about throughput, about delivering excessive efficiency and not using a particular give attention to parallelism. That’s why the 64 compute items of the RX Vega 64 could be comfortably bested in gaming phrases by simply the 36 CUs used contained in the RX 5700. And so merely slicing CUs from the complete GPU spec isn’t going to make a huge distinction to the general gaming efficiency of the chip.
Cutting the frequency, nonetheless, simply may. And the RX 5700 is operating its GPU considerably slower than the RX 5700 XT.
In phrases of the rated speeds AMD is utilizing a brand new time period – Game clock. This is arguably a little bit of a cake-and-eat-it scenario for the crimson group, the place it nonetheless will get to shout about its hardly ever seen peak engine clock pace whereas additionally referencing the real-world efficiency you’re really prone to see.
The RX 5700 has a Game clock of 1,625MHz and the RX 5700 XT has a Game clock of 1,755MHz. That 130MHz distinction doesn’t appear too nice, however in our testing we have been seeing the XT really high even its peak engine clock of 1,905MHz, typically hitting 1,943MHz, whereas the RX 5700 barely acquired above its rated Game clock pace at a peak of 1,677MHz. That potential 266MHz distinction is sort of a large hole and will go an extended method to explaining the body fee delta between the 2 Navi siblings.
AMD Radeon RX 5700 benchmarks
AMD Radeon RX 5700 efficiency
If we take the RX 5700’s fundamental goal first – the OG RTX 2060, a card that’s nonetheless being saved round regardless of Nvidia’s Super launch – it’s in bother. If you simply take a look at the 3DMark and Assassin’s Creed Odyssey efficiency you’d be forgiven for pondering that these two identically priced playing cards the place on par, however look additional and the delta turns into between 10 – 15% in favour of the brand new AMD GPU. And that’s true whether or not you’re wanting on the 1080p or 1400p ranges.
the RTX 2060 Super is simply 5% faster on the widest margin between the 2 playing cards
The relative efficiency to the more-expensive RTX 2060 Super can also be fascinating. At 1440p the Nvidia card does typically have some room to breathe, once more within the 3DMark and Assassin’s Creed benchmarks, however elsewhere it’s far nearer – to the purpose the place the body fee delta virtually disappears.
It’s much more stark at 1080p the place the RTX 2060 Super is simply 5% faster on the widest margin between the 2 playing cards. Throw in a bit of overclocking magic and I’m satisfied you would get RTX 2060 Super efficiency out of the RX 5700… although the identical may be stated for the Nvidia card in relation to pulling away from the second-tier Navi once more and catching as much as the Radeon RX 5700 XT.
But that’s how the gaming hole between the usual 5700 and the XT card could be bridged. It’s wider than it’s to the RTX Super card, the place the XT is as much as 18% sooner in F1 2019, however when there’s an overclocking-friendly launch driver that would properly be fairly drastically decreased.
The historic efficiency targets, nonetheless, actually spotlight the advances AMD has made with the Navi RDNA structure. This $349 card comfortably tops the previous $499 RX Vega 64 by way of gaming body charges, and by way of energy and thermals too. At peak, the RX 5700 runs with 26% decrease energy calls for and does so 10°C cooler.
That’s evidently not only a results of the change to the 7nm lithography both, as a result of for those who take a look at the RX 5700 XT, to get to its GPU efficiency the Navi chip on the XT’s coronary heart runs on the similar thermal ranges because the Vega silicon and with nearly the identical energy draw too.
Those thermal and energy ranges additionally spotlight how a lot better Nvidia’s 12nm Turing effectivity nonetheless is. The RTX 2060 Super could solely be a bit of sooner than the RX 5700, but it surely runs 11°C cooler and solely sucks down one other 14W by way of peak GPU energy. All that regardless of being a 12nm design on a chip that’s a full 70% bigger than the 7nm Navi silicon.
Nvidia has now confirmed it’s going to be shifting to Samsung’s 7nm EUV node – most likely subsequent yr – for its subsequent era structure and which means the inexperienced group’s GPUs are solely going to get extra environment friendly. And, relying on how deep the EUV integration goes and the way a lot of a reduction Nvidia will get for being a 7nm launch accomplice for Samsung, its manufacturing prices could possibly be fairly low too.
AMD Radeon RX 5700 verdict
This is a tricky one to name. The pre-launch value minimize for the RX 5700 hasn’t had wherever close to as dramatic an influence because the one which the RX 5700 XT has loved, but it’s nonetheless a very good card. You may say all of that’s proof of AMD’s worries concerning the competing Nvidia Super playing cards, although I believe it’s extra about displaying an absence of correct planning relating to how group GeForce may reply to Navi.
Whatever the reality of the matter, the place the XT card has shifted its focus from the RTX 2070 to the RTX 2060 Super, the RX 5700 stays locked on the RTX 2060 by way of each value and efficiency. And on each these counts it has the sting over the inexperienced group’s card; it would even stand up close to the XT’s efficiency with some considered overclocking. Which additionally may put it immediately on par with the equally priced RTX 2060 Super too.
Though therein lies a possible drawback. It’s $50 cheaper than both the $399 RX 5700 XT or RTX 2060 Super playing cards and but may get inside touching distance of the efficiency of each given the anticipated headroom it holds. That’s not such a problem for Nvidia because the Turing GPU additionally has its personal headroom with which to take care of a lead… whereas the XT, I believe, doesn’t.
There’s additionally the ray traced elephant within the room. Nvidia has whole dominion over the next-gen pretties, whereas AMD has admitted that’s not coming to its PC GPUs till the following roll of the Navi cube. You could scoff on the function now, however Nvidia and Microsoft are dedicated to ray tracing on the PC, and Microsoft and Sony are dedicated to it for his or her respective next-gen consoles. And simply take a look at the E3 game bulletins; no matter your emotions about ray traced results it’s occurring, and an increasing number of games and builders will begin to sport this further stage of visible constancy.
Nvidia will say its playing cards want to the longer term, whereas AMD’s are caught up to now
But AMD’s playing cards can’t take part on this visible feast. It will level to the GPU calls for of turning on the function, and level to its playing cards being targeted on pure gaming efficiency with out body fee dropping extras. But you would say the identical for any variety of graphical applied sciences of their nascent phases, hell, even greater resolutions too. Why transfer from 720p to 1080p if it cuts my efficiency? Why use anti-aliasing? Nvidia will say its playing cards want to the longer term, whereas AMD’s are caught up to now.
Where you see your self in that individual argument will dictate whether or not you simply desire a graphics card that may deal with the rasterised gaming calls for of immediately or whether or not you wish to take part on the ray tracing occasion.
But whichever of these you select the RX 5700 stays a tough card to advocate outright, particularly with 4 completely different GPUs competing for the abruptly crowded $350-$399 phase. The RX 5700 XT is the faster straight rasterising GPU of the lot, whereas the RTX 2060 Super is simply a bit of slower, however brings its ray tracing and AI-powered weapons to the gaming shootout. The RX 5700 is simply a bit of slower once more, however has a $50 saving and a few overclocking potential.
Though I don’t assume that’s fairly sufficient for it to actually fear the 2 playing cards above it contemplating most avid gamers won’t ever even get near overclocking their costly GPUs.
The RX 5700 may then develop into one for the AMD purists with its OC potential, and will in the future develop into a critical worth proposition with additional value cuts down the street. But immediately it’s actually only a good card that’s being outmuscled in a now very crowded market.
Source
