Intel has now formally introduced its new Core i9 9900K processor, proclaiming it because the “world’s best gaming processor.” It’s not just a few advertising bluster both… effectively, not totally. Intel has commissioned Principled Technologies to do a benchmarking sesh on its latest ninth Gen chips, and their competitors, throughout 19 of the preferred PC games.
And it’s not simply the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X that Intel is specializing in right here, the benchmarks additionally embody the 18-core Intel X-series Core i9 9980XE, the confusingly titled i9 9900X, and a few Threadripper chips too.
The take a look at platforms are all similar, except for the motherboard and CPU, utilizing a GTX 1080 Ti graphics card, 16GB DDR4 reminiscence (at both 2,666MHz or 2,933MHz), and with the Windows 10 1803 construct on a Samsung 970 Pro SSD. In phrases of the games, the corporate benchmarked Total War: Warhammer 2, Far Cry 5, Assassin’s Creed: Origins, Civilization VI, Rainbow Six Siege, PUBG, Rise of the Tomb Raider, WoW: Battle for Azeroth, and a bunch of different fashionable titles.
Principled Technologies both used in-game benchmarking instruments or FRAPs to report the typical FPS of games that don’t embody them. Y’know, these actually annoying games that hate {hardware} testers.
In the ultimate reckoning the Intel Core i9 9900Ok outperformed the entire different processors examined within the majority of the games. Only Shadow of War and Rise of the Tomb Raider appear to have given it some pause, with the 9900Ok scoring the identical because the 8700Ok and 8086Ok on Shadow of War, and dropping out to the 18-core, $2,000 i9 9980XE in Rise of the Tomb Raider.
But the true level of all that is for Intel to have the ability to maintain out the 9900Ok as arms down the very best gaming processor in contrast with the AMD competitors, and in that it appears to have excelled. On some games, resembling Civ VI and PUBG, the efficiency delta isn’t essentially that nice, however for probably the most half you’re between 30 and 50% increased body charges from the 9900Ok versus the 2700X.
Arguably most of the demonstrated gaming efficiency increase from the Intel chip comes right down to its increased clock pace, versus the extra ephemeral benefit of the additional pair of cores and better thread-count. We don’t know what Z390 board Intel was utilizing, or whether or not it was able to hitting a 5GHz all-core pace out-of-the-box, so the precise clock pace of the chip is a little bit of a thriller.
It’s additionally value noting that that is solely exhibiting the relative 1080p efficiency of the competing processors, and most of the people gaming on this kind of high-end {hardware} aren’t going to be taking part in at that decision. It’s good for highlighting the body fee delta, however not essentially consultant of ultimate consumer expertise. The efficiency distinction can be far much less noticeable at 1440p, and particularly at 4K, however we received’t see these numbers till we’re capable of publish our personal figures when the evaluate embargo raise in the direction of the top of the month.
This additionally means we’ve bought some critically early gaming efficiency figures for the X-series CPUs which aren’t going to launch till subsequent month on the earliest. That’s maybe slightly uncommon, however it exhibits mainly the important thing takeaway is that if you’d like the best possible gaming chip you don’t have to attend for the high-end desktop processors to land in November.
Source
