The Ryzen 7 1700 is the most cost effective of AMD’s first Zen-based CPUs and in addition now my favorite, and never simply because I’m a financially-focused bread head. For me that is the place AMD’s octa-core Ryzen 7 CPUs genuinely give Intel a little bit of a headache with regards to gaming chips, providing eight cores and 16 threads of processing energy for lower than the price of a regular quad-core Core i7 7700K.
How a lot influence has Ryzen had on our CPU information? Check out our decide of the top gaming processors.
Its numerical compatriot, the Ryzen 7 1700X, sits barely above this cheaper octa-core when it comes to nailed-on clockspeeds and better overclocking potential and makes the $500 Ryzen 7 1800X look slightly irrelevant. But for those who’re keen to take a punt on working the straight $330 (£305) 1700 overclocked you then get a extremely highly effective multi-threaded chip for an ideal worth.
It should be lacking the gaming chops of its Intel rivals, however that’s much more forgivable at this extra mainstream worth level. Though issues could change round once more as soon as the Ryzen 5 chips are available in per week or so…
Click on the leap hyperlinks beneath to leap to your part of selection.
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 specs
The R7 1700 is a really barely totally different processing beast from its ‘X’ toting stablemates. The ‘X’ suffix denotes a Ryzen chip sporting the fullest implementation of AMD’s prolonged frequency vary (XFR) which permits the CPU to dynamically enhance its clockspeed (over its acknowledged Turbo clocks) by one other 100MHz if there may be ample cooling headroom.
Without that tag although the Ryzen 7 1700 doesn’t require the identical stage of thermal help, therefore the chip’s 65W TDP. And but, due to AMD’s extra open method to overclocking help, for those who do have an honest cooler you possibly can simply hit the identical ranges of efficiency with just a little gentle overclocking.
On the floor the ‘X’ suffix may appear rather a lot like Intel’s Ok-series, however it really makes rather a lot much less distinction once you’re selecting which AMD CPU will get your vote. Where Intel locks the multipliers, and therefore castrates non Ok-series chips’ overclocking potential, all of the Ryzen processors are set to stay fully unlocked and overclockable.
The solely limits AMD is putting in lie on the chipset facet. The top-end X370 will get all of the overclocking bells and whistling issues, whereas the B350 nonetheless will get itself some OC capabilities too. The backside rung of the AMD chipset ladder, the A320, would not get any overclocking help in any respect.
The inventory clockspeeds for the Ryzen 7 1700 are inevitably probably the most conservative of the octa-core triumvirate. The considerably miserly 3GHz base clock isn’t an excessive amount of of a fear as, even with all cores full of duties, you’ll see the 1700 push itself past that arbitrary frequency – our pattern caught across the three.2GHz mark at 1005 load. It’s peak single-core clock of three.7GHz is extra prefer it although, being solely 100MHz behind the highest velocity of the 1700X.
And that’s the place the variations largely finish, even in contrast with the $500 R7 1800X. The Ryzen 7 1700 continues to be rocking SMT so it’s received the complete thread-count of 16 and retains the identical stage of cache reminiscence, the identical variety of PCIe three.zero lanes and the identical primary 14nm Zen core design. It is, to all intents and functions, only a barely down-clocked model of the full-fat 1800X.
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 efficiency
The drop in single and all-core clockspeeds is de facto all that’s answerable for the decrease efficiency of the Ryzen 7 1700 in opposition to the opposite two AMD chips we’ve examined. It’s most blatant within the CPU-intensive benchmarks of Cinebench’s rendering and X264’s encoding assessments. The single-threaded speeds are nicely down on the 1800X and just a little behind the 1700X and the identical rings true for its multi-threaded efficiency too.
That mentioned we’re nonetheless speaking about Zen’s glorious multi-core efficiency right here, with these 16 threads nonetheless able to consuming correctly threaded purposes for breakfast, second breakfast, brunch, lunch, tea, dinner and supper. AMD’s Ryzen chips are just like the grasping hobbits of the productiveness processor world.
Even the very most cost-effective of AMD’s Ryzen 7 vary can bat apart the in any other case aggressive Core i7 6800K in these CPU-intensive duties and is a good distance forward of the marginally dearer quad-core, eight-thread i7 7700Ok in all however the single-threaded assessments.
As ever although it’s that single-threaded efficiency which makes the Intel Core design a extra good selection from a straight gaming viewpoint. But with the additional productiveness efficiency on provide, for across the similar worth as an Intel quad-core, the selection turns into rather a lot much less clear reduce for anybody seeking to do the rest with their machine exterior of merely gaming.
The Ryzen 7 1700’s gaming efficiency additionally makes issues robust for the opposite chips within the octa-core vary. At inventory speeds there actually isn’t rather a lot between this lower-caste Ryzen 7 and the 2 ‘X’ chips, and once you stage out the clockspeed variations through overclocking you may make that delta even smaller.
In the overclocking stakes although you gained’t fairly get to the identical ranges because the dearer Ryzen chips. Our 1700 pattern tapped out at three.9GHz and, with our primary overclocking, we couldn’t get it to carry stably at 4GHz. The 1700X managed to stay at 4GHz whereas the 1800X topped four.1GHz. That mentioned, the Ryzen 7 1700 runs noticeably cooler at three.9GHz than the toasty 1800X at its overclocked peaks. Even taking into consideration the sensor discrepancy which artificially notes temperatures 20॰C increased on the ‘X’ chips the 1700 peaks at simply 63॰C whereas the 1800X delivers an adjusted most temperature of 72॰C.
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 verdict
The Ryzen 7 1700 is de facto what I hoped for from the primary octa-core Zen-based chips. It’s across the similar worth as Intel’s eight-threaded quad-core i7 7700Ok, if just a little cheaper, and runs rings round it from a straight CPU efficiency viewpoint. Despite all of the hype, hope and bluster AMD’s Zen cores have been by no means going to greatest Intel’s single-threaded/gaming efficiency, however the 1700 is simply as succesful on that entrance as both of its greater Ryzen brothers.
I’m nonetheless not going to advocate any of the octa-core Ryzens because the go-to processors for players purely seeking to get the very best body charges out of their graphics silicon, however with the mix of worth and multi-threaded efficiency the dual 1700 and 1700X CPUs convey high-end desktop productiveness all the way down to a really unprecedented worth level.
And for those who’re more likely to spend as a lot time rendering or encoding as you’re gaming then the Ryzen 7 1700 actually is a tricky one to beat.
You do although must run the Ryzen 7 1700 in an overclocked state to have the ability to get the most effective steadiness of efficiency out of it, and that can presumably restrict the lifespan of the chip. Because Zen continues to be solely a really new processor design we are able to’t actually communicate to the longevity of the , particularly when it’s being run exterior its inventory parameters, however contemplating the temperature of the 1700 stays comparatively low I’m not massively frightened. If you’re although, and once you’re nonetheless spending over 300 clams on a slice of silicon that’s comprehensible, the Ryzen 7 1700X may nicely be a greater decide.
Source
