Have you ever had that feeling when enjoying sure team-based multiplayer maps that issues are barely unfair for one of many groups? That one facet has it barely more durable, and it’s tougher to win when enjoying as them? And whenever you point out it or complain about it, you’re met with a torrent of “eh, seems fine to me”? Well, within the case of the Rialto map in Overwatch, you might not be loopy.
A disgruntled participant took to the Overwatch boards to complain concerning the steadiness within the map, and was fairly shocked when Blizzard vice chairman Jeff Kaplan entered the dialogue – to confess that the map actually is unbalanced. There’s roughly a 14% win fee discrepancy, with Attackers extra prone to come out on prime – nevertheless, Kaplan says that that is “not hugely out of line.”
“In the past week, Attackers win 42.88%,” he says, suggesting that Defenders win 57.12% of the time. “We always try to balance toward a 50/50 win rate. We have some minor tweaks we can make to bring the map more in line… While it’s not perfect, it’s also not hugely out of line.”
Kaplan has posted win rate percentages for maps earlier than, and issues appeared far nearer to the 50/50 break up that Blizzard are aiming for. King’s Row and Watchpoint: Gilbraltar in reality have been close to dead-on 50% every method. The largest distinction on the time was with Horizon, during which Attackers received 54.50% and Defenders received 45.50% – a 9% discrepancy. While Rialto is a more moderen map, 14% nonetheless appears vital.
Players within the thread commented that Rialto was turning into “a sniperfest”, however many believed that Horizon Lunar Colony was way more unbalanced. “Horizon makes me want to uninstall every time I see it pop up,” mentioned consumer Dragon. “Nothing in this game comes as close to being as bad as Horizon Lunar Colony. NOTHING!!!”
Source
