Ubisoft’s For Honor Season three match was a shambles.
For Honor’s Grudge and Glory update drops tomorrow, kicking off Season three.
The replace introduces two new heroes, two new maps, a Legendary gear tier, and 9 new territories on the world map.
To mark the event, Ubisoft held a match over the weekend – which was livestreamed – so when issues began to go incorrect, all of us skilled the cringe collectively.
The worst moments have been posted over on Reddit, and acted as a showcase for the sport’s bugs and balancing points.
The Raider remains to be OP with the Stampede Charge, and you may see the issue in motion on this snippet of gameplay right here.
Another incensing clip was the bug that resulted in a participant’s hero falling to the bottom after being repelled from a grapple try. Appraently this can be a widespread drawback that happens on uneven terrain.
Things bought even worse when PC finalist SB.Alernakin a.okay.a. Jakub Palen gained his match utilizing the Unlock Tech exploit, which is summed up properly by the OP ColdBlackCage as “a technique that changes certain properties of the abilities and moves in the game if preformed at particular times.”
Some members of the group view the approach as dishonest, so the victory was already tarnished by this, after which made 100 instances worse when Palen stated, “I didn’t think it would be this easy.”
Ouch.
For Honor’s new artistic director got here out to current him along with his award, saying, “Soon you might have to change your play style, but honestly, that’s a fucking good job.”
The Season three replace is making plenty of steadiness and bug fixes, so presumably Unlock Tech goes to be addressed primarily based on that remark.
Either approach, the sport isn’t in nice form and the match served to focus on the problems, with gamers utilizing exploits to progress – and win.
What do you consider all of this? Is it honest to make use of an exploit if it’s within the sport? Is it dishonest to make use of them in tournaments?
Let us know your ideas within the feedback under.
Source
